Comments on: Charlie Sheen Roast vs. Ashton Kutcher’s “Two and a Half Men” Debut

By: rhodasimmons

rhodasimmons — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:34:34 +0000

The idea of putting charlie sheen in yet another sitcom that really doesn’t require him to, you know, ACT, and having to deal with him being “in character”/just himself (in this case, angry) around a set pretty much tops my list of jobs I would never take (oh, okay, second only to working for Scott Rudin) http://bit.ly/nIe79F

By: elnamassa

elnamassa — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 09:25:27 +0000

Charlie shot this a year ago. Basically it is surfacing when he did not have a drop of “Tiger’s Blood” in him and still employed. Gee. Wonder why it is popping up now? http://bit.ly/nIe79F

By: Kevin

Kevin — Sat, 09 Jul 2011 00:16:20 +0000

I will not be watching a “Two and a Half Men” without Charlies Sheen. He may have gotten a bit out of control and arrogant but his character is the one which fused the whole program together! It just won’t work without him considering how many years it has been on. Just remember “Three’s Company” once Suzanne Sommers left or the Ropers for Mr. Hurley. It lost that punch!